GreenLetter XIV: Building the Roadmap for India's Green Steel Transition

India's steel sector emits 10–12% of the country's total greenhouse gases and with crude steel production set to nearly double toward the National Steel Policy's 300 MTPA target by 2030–31, that burden will only grow.

GreenLetter XIV: Building the Roadmap for India's Green Steel Transition

India's steel sector emits 10–12% of the country's total greenhouse gases and with crude steel production set to nearly double toward the National Steel Policy's 300 MTPA target by 2030–31 [1], that burden will only grow. This GreenLetter lays out the technologies, costs, and policy sequencing needed to make green steel commercially viable at scale in India.

GREENTREE'S CONTRIBUTION: GreenTree carried out in-depth research and structured stakeholder consultations across the steel procurement value chain, public buyers, sellers, contractors, engineers, and architects, building on the Ministry of Steel's Greening the Steel Sector roadmap and the Green Steel Taxonomy to develop strategies for green steel adoption.

The scale of the challenge

India is the world's second-largest crude steel producer, contributing approximately 7.4% of global output, with an installed capacity of 179.5 million tonnes (MT) and production of 144.3 MT in FY 2023–24 [2]. The sector contributes around 2% of India's GDP [3] but its emissions intensity remains among the highest globally, driven by heavy reliance on coal-based routes and grid electricity.

Steel demand is led by construction (43%), infrastructure (25%), engineering/ packaging/white goods (22%), automobiles (9%), and defence (1%). India's installed capacity splits roughly 56% Integrated Steel Plants (BF–BOF and DRI–EAF) and 44% Secondary Steel Industries (predominantly Coal DRI–IF) with the higher-emitting route, due to non-coking coal use and lower process efficiency.

Figure 1: Emissions intensity by production route. Coal DRI–IF, dominant among Secondary Steel Industries, carries the highest carbon intensity of any route in commercial use today [4].
“India's steel stock is set to nearly double by 2030–31. Without a sequenced push on efficiency, renewables, and breakthrough process technologies, that growth locks in decades of avoidable emissions. Sequenced correctly, it becomes one of the country's largest untapped industrial decarbonisation opportunities.”

Nine pathways, one transition

Conventional steelmaking still dominates production, but a spectrum of technologies from commercially mature routes to early-stage breakthroughs is emerging to decarbonise the sector. These vary widely in maturity, emissions-reduction potential, and commercial readiness.

Technique

Emissions

TRL

National / global examples

BF–BOF

2.2–2.6 tCO₂/tcs

9

National: SAIL, Tata Steel

Coal DRI–IF

2.7–3.1 tCO₂/tcs

9

National: JSPL, JSW

NG DRI–EAF

1.4–1.6 tCO₂/tcs

9

National: Tata, JSW, JSPL

Scrap–EAF

~0.3 tCO₂/tcs

9

National: JSW, Kalyani Steel

HIsmelt

1.6 tCO₂/thm

9

Global: Rio Tinto, Nucor, Kwinana (Australia)

Rotary Hearth Furnace

1.3–1.6 tCO₂/tcs

9

Global: Nippon Steel, POSCO (Korea)

Hydrogen-based DRI–EAF

Near zero (with H₂ + RE)

6–8

National: Tata, JSW, Jindal Stainless, CSIR–IMMT; Global: HYBRIT, H2 Green Steel

HIsarna

0.4 tCO₂/tcs (after CCS)

6

National: Tata Steel India; Global: Tata Steel Ijmuiden, Rio Tinto

Molten Oxide Electrolysis

Near zero (with RE)

5–6

Global: Boston Metal (produced >1 tonne of iron at pilot scale)

Electrowinning

~0.3 tCO₂/tcs

5-6

Global: SIDERWIN consortium, led by ArcelorMittal (pilot has produced ~4 kg of iron)

Hydrogen Plasma Smelting

Zero (with RE)

5

National: CSIR–IMMT; Global: SuSteel (Austria)

Figure 2: Technology Readiness Level (TRL) plotted against emissions intensity. The mature routes in the top-right cluster carry the sector's emissions today, the emerging cluster on the left holds the long-term decarbonisation potential.

Four decarbonisation levers

Reaching net-zero by 2070 requires coordinated action across four interconnected levers, not sequential silos, but a portfolio deployed in parallel and sequenced by feasibility.

PILLAR 01

Renewable electricity integration

Scale renewable power in steel operations toward the 43.33% RPO target by 2030, cutting the emission factor from 2.54 to 2.35 tCO₂/tcs, an 8% reduction at the grid-mix level.

PILLAR 02

Carbon capture, utilisation & storage

Deploy CCUS across BF–BOF routes, where ~56% of current emissions can only be abated this way. Requires dedicated CO₂ transport, utilisation and storage infrastructure.

PILLAR 03

Biomass & circularity

Scale biochar injection (up to 1.19 tCO₂/tcs reduction potential) and expand scrap-based EAF, supported by the Steel Scrap Recycling Policy and Vehicle Scrappage Policy.

PILLAR 04

Process transition & material efficiency

Shift capacity toward DRI–EAF and hydrogen-based routes; adopt best available technologies (BAT) across ISPs and SSIs, backed by an estimated ₹23,257 crore in CAPEX.

Anatomy of a tonne of steel

Primary and secondary steelmaking pull emissions from different points in the process which matters, because it determines which decarbonisation lever pays off first. Both routes run through material prep, iron reduction, melting/refining, and rolling; the two flows below show where each carries its heaviest load.

Primary steel: BF–BOF route

Sintering / Pelletising

Coke making

Ironmaking (Blast
Furnace)

♨ largest single source

Steel making (BOF)

Rolling

The blast furnace carries the bulk of the emissions load in this route, as coke and coal serve both as fuels and chemical reducing agents. Therefore, this stage cannot simply be electrified and requires alternative solutions such as hydrogen, biochar, or CCU.

Secondary steel: Coal DRI–IF route

Pelletising

DRI Production
(Rotary Kiln)

♨ largest single source

Melting (Induction
Furnace)

Rolling

Here the load sits with the rotary kiln, India's coal-based DRI relies on high-ash non-coking coal with inherently lower combustion efficiency than the alternatives, which is why Coal DRI–IF carries the highest emissions intensity of any route in commercial use today.

Where routes fall on the taxonomy

India's Green Steel definition sets the line at an emissions intensity below 2.2 tCO₂ per tonne of finished steel (tfs) expressed as a % ‘greenness’ relative to that threshold. Plotting each production route against it shows how far conventional routes sit from the line, and how close some transition options already are.

 Figure 3: Emissions intensity of each route plotted against India's official Green Steel threshold and the current national blended average.

India's Ministry of Steel notified the Green Steel Taxonomy [5] via Gazette Notification No. 763(E) on 12 December 2024, the first such taxonomy released by any country. It certifies steel on a four-tier star rating based on emissions intensity (Scope 1 + Scope 2 + a limited Scope 3 covering sintering, pellet-making, coke-making and purchased raw materials, excluding mining/transport/downstream use), with the National Institute of Secondary Steel Technology (NISST) as the certifying body. Certificates are issued annually and thresholds are reviewed every three years.

The policy landscape

Seven overlapping policy instruments currently shape India's steel decarbonisation push spanning energy efficiency mandates, procurement preference, scrap recycling, green hydrogen, and carbon markets.

Policy

Objective

Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT), 2012

Improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions via Specific Energy Consumption (SEC) targets and tradable Energy Saving Certificates (ESCerts).

National Steel Policy (NSP), 2017

Expand capacity, improve raw material security, promote R&D. Targets 300 MTPA capacity and 160 kg per-capita consumption by 2030–31.

DMI&SP Policy, 2017

Promotes domestically manufactured iron & steel in government procurement, preferencing products with ≥15% domestic value addition.

Steel Scrap Recycling Policy, 2019

Establishes an organised scrap recycling ecosystem to improve domestic scrap availability and support decarbonisation.

Vehicle Scrappage Policy, 2021

Increases domestic ferrous scrap availability through scientific scrapping of end-of-life vehicles.

National Green Hydrogen Mission, 2023

Promotes green hydrogen for hard-to-abate sectors incl. steel; targets 5 MTPA production backed by 125 GW renewable capacity by 2030.

Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, 2023

Establishes the Indian Carbon Market through emission-intensity targets and carbon credit trading.

What it costs and what it doesn't

  1. ₹23,257 crore in estimated CAPEX to deploy Best Available Technologies (BAT) across Integrated and Secondary Steel plants.
  2. ₹73,861 crore required to reach 43.33% renewable electricity penetration in the sector by 2030–31 (assuming 50:50 solar–wind hybridisation).
  3. Steel accounts for only ~18% of total infrastructure project cost replacing 20% of conventional steel with a 30%-premium green steel raises total project cost by just ~1.1%. Even 100% green procurement adds only 1.83–5.50%.
  4. Green hydrogen-based steel carries a 50–70% premium today, projected to fall to 20–29% by 2030–31 as scale, renewable costs, and hydrogen production costs improve.
  5. Near-zero BF–BOF steel via CCUS carries a 20–68% premium, based on an assumed CO₂ capture cost of USD 50–92/tCO₂. Around 56% of BF–BOF emissions can only be abated through this pathway.

How the transition is sequenced

The roadmap to a net-zero steel sector by 2070 unfolds across three phases each building the conditions for the next.

What next?

If this is a space you're working in steel procurement, decarbonisation financing, or applied R&D we would love to speak.

As per our research few potential action points are listed below:

  1. Create demand for green steel: Use public procurement and large infrastructure projects to introduce minimum emissions-intensity criteria and gradually increase the share of low-carbon steel purchased.
  2. Use pilots to de-risk the transition: Select a few high-emission steel plants and applications for technology demonstrations, measure actual emissions reductions, and use the results to inform wider-scale investment and policy.
  3. Pushing MSME potential for green steel: Build awareness and provide targeted technical support to MSME steel producers to adopt lower-emission production routes, enabling their transition towards green steel while contributing to India’s NDC and long-term decarbonisation goals.
The immediate priority should not be to wait for one breakthrough technology. India can start reducing steel emissions now through efficiency, renewable power, scrap, biomass and procurement while simultaneously building the infrastructure and pilots needed for hydrogen and CCUS to scale over the longer term.

Green Steel Transition | Industrial Decarbonization | Energy Efficiency | GHG Accounting | Carbon Reduction Strategies | Low-Carbon Technologies

Greenletter is GreenTree's periodic newsletter on energy efficiency, sustainability, and market transformation across India's buildings and industry sectors.

Authored by: Anurag Bajpai, Priya Kumari, Tanya Saini, Himanshu Sharma

Follow our activities on Twitter | Linkedin | Youtube | Instagram | Facebook